A 2004 survey of Moroccans reported that 8% had a ‘favourable’ or ‘very favourable’
image of President Bush, but the comparable figure for bin laden was 45%
So what turns the otherwise moderate and reasonable North African into such
a restless, divided creature? The Palestine issue. These people have little
displeasure with either America or the American people. Their dissatisfaction
is not with the West’s fundamental democratic beliefs, but with foreign policy.
What makes the profile of the United States so overwhelmingly negative in these
parts is its unconditional support for Israel in the Occupied Territories and
for its gratuitous gutting of Iraq. Ussama
Makdisi, a Professor of History at Rice University writes:
”on no issue is Arab anger at the United States more widely and acutely
felt than that of Palestine …. For it is over Palestine that otherwise antithetical
Arab and Islamist interpretations of history converge in their common perception
of an immense gulf separating official American avowals of support for freedom
from actual American Policies” - Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy, Mearsheimer
& Walt, 2007
The Los
Angeles Times only this year wrote, “Morocco finds itself in the eye
of a storm radiating across Europe, North Africa and the Middle East.”
Between 2003 and 2007 Moroccan resentment finally erupted in a series of bombings
that took place in Casablanca, the country’s largest city. The attacks were
the worst in Morocco’s relatively peaceful history. Such was the urgency of
the threat that in July 2007, Moroccan Interior Minister Chakib Benmoussa took
the astonishing measure of raising the terrorist alert level for Morocco to
maximum. The previous 12 months had witnessed a progressive increase in the
number of political statements and terrorist plots targeting Morocco. The most
recent group to publicly declare its discontent and issue a declaration of jihad
against the government of King Mohammed VI was the newly constituted "Ansar
al-Islam in the Muslim Desert, the Land of the Veiled Men"
The Interior Ministry responded by ordering security services to undertake
a ‘total mobilization’ and indicated that the current level of deployed security
forces would be doubled.
This must have been small consolation to the West as Morocco had generally
been regarded as Europe’s gateway to the East and was notorious for the number
of transients and migrants drifting across its borders. As a gateway it was
largely unmanned. Were Morocco’s own intelligence services likely to be sufficient
in the face of such an unprecedented threat? What guarantees did we have that
such a threat could be disabled and contained?
Israel and the West’s concern was no doubt compounded by the suicide bombers’
choice of targets, which had, in the 2003 Casablanca bombings at least, covered
a range of civilian locations: a five star hotel, a Jewish Cemetery, a Jewish
community centre, a Jewish-owned Italian restaurant and a Belgian Consulate.
In all, 12 bombers died, along with 33 civilians. Two bombers were arrested
before they could carry out attacks.
More than 100 people were injured. Eight of the dead were Europeans (three
Spanish among them) and the rest were Moroccan. Somewhat predictably, the suicide
bombers themselves came from the poor suburbs and shantytowns of Casablanca.
By contrast, the attacks in 2007 were much less of a triumph; the bombers thwarted
in their attempts either to detonate the charges successfully or forced to detonate
them too early.
According to Assabah newspaper the real target had been Casablanca's police
and paramilitary headquarters – but it seems inevitable that their plans would
have included at least a handful of anti-Semitic strikes given the focus of
earlier efforts and the bombing of Lebanon the previous summer (the remaining
targets were dismissed by the press as ‘tourist locations’, perhaps understandably)
At this point I would like to remind you of a sadly forgotten event in Israel’s
long and turbulent history: the Lavon
Affair.
When people ask me if I believe it is possible for a country’s security and
intelligence services to stage-manage an event aimed at precipitating a series
of responses from another country or for creating a moral pretext for some policy
or other, I tend to remind them of the Lavon Affair.
I’ll let Wikipedia take up the issue:
”The Lavon Affair refers to the scandal over a failed Israeli covert operation
in Egypt known as Operation Susannah, in which Israeli military intelligence
planted bombs in Egyptian, American and British-owned targets in Egypt in the
summer of 1954. It became known as the Lavon Affair after the Israeli defense
minister Pinhas Lavon, who was forced to resign because of the incident, or
euphemistically as the Unfortunate Affair. Israel admitted responsibility in
2005 when Israeli President Moshe Katzav honored the nine Egyptian Jewish agents
who were involved." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair
The purpose of the mission was to sow discord between America and Egypt; a
covert operation in which a series of bombings would be blamed on Egyptian Nationalists
and unite the US, Israel and Britain in a common struggle against militant extremism
and a weak and unpredictable regime in Egypt. The plot had been hatched by Israel’s
Minister of Defence, Pinhas Lavon (a dedicated Zionist) and was conceived in
response to the growing friendship between President Gamal Abdul Nassar
of Egypt and President Dwight D. Eisenhower (in the 1948 Arab-Israeli
War, Egypt had taken control of the Gaza Strip).
How was a new and fledgling Israeli power able to establish roots in a territory
fought over almost daily by warring Arab Nations? By enlisting the cooperation
and resources of a power greater than all of them.
So naturally, when a renewed threat of aggression appears from unexpected quarters,
efforts must be maintained to apply pressure. The problem for Israel and the
West in such circumstances is in obtaining reliable intelligence without jeopardising
exisiting relations, especially from a country that has until that point, at
least, been considered a cooperative, if volatile ally. Whilst it is true that
Israel and Morocco had never enjoyed full diplomatic relations, they had (at
least until the death of King Hassan in ’99) benefited from a mutually supportive
dialogue.
One solution is to get a team of experts into the country to assess the situation,
which was indeed carried out in April of this year:
” A delegation of American CIA and FBI agents were in Morocco to examine
the terrorist network of Belgian-Moroccan terrorist and informant Abdelkader
Belliraj. US interest in Belliraj is based on a connection between him and al-Qaeda
and Hezbollah. Meanwhile, the Belgian police delegation has returned from Morocco
and convinced of Belliraj’s significance in the network, and may be responsible
for more incidents of terrorism than initially presumed.” (De
Morgen, April 2008)
The renewed interest was as a result of the arrests in Morocco of a group of
35 terrorists suspects in February 2008. Nothing perhaps shocking in itself,
but shocking when one learned that the 35 suspects were not this time underprivileged
and over-radicalised young boys from the shantytowns of the poorer suburbs but
a network that consisted of politicians and businessmen, bureaucrats and pharmacists,
a police commander and a TV journalist.
The alleged leader of the group, 51-year old, Abdelkader
Belliraj was a well-off Moroccan immigrant living in Belgium who had financed
his activities through a combination of multimillion-dollar robberies and political
assassinations in a career spanning decades (he was also alleged to have been
an informant for the Belgian State Security Services and for several other intelligence
agencies, including France's DGSE and the CIA). Morocco’s Interior Minister
Chakib Benmoussa said in an interview that the group plotted to assassinate
Cabinet ministers, military chiefs and Jewish leaders in an effort to ‘destabilize
this moderate Muslim nation’. He also alleged that in 2001 Belliraj and several
of his followers travelled to Afghanistan to receive orders from al-Qaeda second-in-command,
Ayman al-Zawahiri. His followers trained subsequently in al-Qaeda camps alongside
militants belonging to the Moroccan Islamic Combatant Group, another al-Qaeda
linked Moroccan militant group. That same group would eventually carry out the
series of bombings in 2003 and play a role in the Madrid train bombings in 2004.
Again, somewhat predictably, the network headed by Belliraj in 2008, had long
established links to Shiite Muslim movements, including Hezbollah – Israel’s
longtime rival.
Other news agencies reported the incident:
” Belgium-based Moroccan behind dismantled terror network
28 May 2008, by News Agencies
Anti-terrorism police in Morocco and Belgium have detained 11 suspects with
alleged links to both Belgium and Al-Qaeda offshoots in Northern Africa. Authorities
say that members of the group may have plotted attacks on a luxury hotel in
Brussels and European Union facilities.”
By coincidence, Oakley
International, the US-based private investigators which boasts former CIA,
FBI and Mi5 personnel, was hired to conduct surveillance activity on a paedophile
network in Belgium during this same period. The company had been hired by Kate
and Gerry McCann in their efforts to find their daughter. It was, however, not
the first time the two operations had crossed paths, the couple’s private investigations
similarly taking them to Morocco and across the path of convicted Dutch terrorist,
Eef
Hoos (owner of a pet crematorium in Portugal) and one time 'Al Capone of
the Hague'.
When confronted with the information, a spokesman for the Belgian Federal Police
dismissed their claims:
’We are not aware of the existence of a paedophile network, especially
one with the characteristics claimed by the British media.’ - http://sosmaddie.dhblogs.be/
So if they weren't chasing paedos in Belgium, who the bloody hell were they
chasing?
Of course, cross-border cooperation amongst all these countries may be one
way of addressing the movement of terrorist cells and paedophile networks, but
how do we impose our will in countries that are not a part of the European Union
and have no intention of signing this agreement? How do we guarantee their commitment
to solving the problem?
It was obviously a concern of Portugal, because in July this year, Morocco
and Portugal pledged to diversify bilateral relations and implement ‘enduring
and mutually-beneficial bilateral cooperation’ in order to take up such
challenges.
Additionally, Morocco and Portugal called for the revival of the Arab Maghreb
Union (UMA – a regional grouping that includes Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Mauritania,
and Libya) deeming it "a necessity in the current geo-strategic context" as
this would bring "more stability and security" according to a joint statement
made by Moroccan premier, Abbas El Fassi and Portugal's José Socrates.
As a sign of good will, a ‘Memorandum of Understanding’ was signed by the two
countries to double Portugal's credit line to Morocco to 400 million Euros with
a view to implementing infrastructure projects in Morocco.
Later that same month, Morocco signed a second Memorandum of Understanding,
this time with the European Commission. The Memorandum, presided over
by President José Barroso, proposed to establish foundations for ‘a sustainable
exchange of statistical data between Morocco and Eurostat’. The agreement,
signed within the context of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) gave priority
to the following sectors: Agriculture, Energy, Environment, External Trade &
Balance of Payments, National Accounts, Social, Transport and Tourism. In light
of developments in Casablanca and Brussels, however, one might speculate that
the remit of this ‘statistical cooperation’ might be extended to security and
justice matters.
Not unsurprisingly, the first ‘Mediterranean’ country to sign such a Memorandum
was Israel.
A development perhaps equally as significant, is Morocco's decision to Exchange
of Letters in respect of NATO’s Operation
Active Endeavour, an operation which evolved out of NATO’s immediate response
to 9/11. Under Operation Active Endeavour, NATO ships have been deployed to
patrol the Mediterranean, monitoring shipping and providing escorts to non-military
vessels through the Straits of Gibraltar to help detect, deter and protect against
terrorist activity, drugs trafficking, irregular migration and the black market
trafficking of goods. However, in order to extend the control of these lines
in the Mediterranean, NATO requires the cooperation of non-NATO nations. At
a ceremony that took place in June
2008 in Brussels an Exchange of Letters was recorded between NATO and Morocco,
a clear indication that Morocco was keen to commit its support to the operation.
Georgia similarly exchanged letters in March 2008. Both Israel and Morocco have,
moreover, expressed an interest in participating more formally in an OEA. So
far they are only ‘Mediterranean Dialogue’ countries to do so.
To set in motion a much sought after sequence of events and concessions – all
you need is a suitable catalyst. Israel knows that. America knows that. Britain
knows that. Even the McCanns know that. Fomenting diplomatic relationships with
meetings, delegations and formal investigations is one thing, but nothing can
replace the quiet application of covert forces to achieve results.
Who said there no short-cuts through bureaucracy?
*****
Updates
- Another Belgian-Moroccan man, Abdallah Ait-Oud, was reecently convicted
of the murder of Belgian schoolgirls, Nathalie Mahy and Stacy Lemmens in June
2006. The case was reprised in June 2007 when an anonymous note was posted
to De Telegraaf newspaper alleging to know the location of the body of Madeleine
McCann. It was linked to a similar note that sucessfully identified the final
resting place of Nathalie and Stacy.
- There are reported to have been over 100 alleged sightings of Madeleine
McCann in Belgium and dozens in Morocco.
- One of the resolutions of the controversial Prum Treaty (incorporated into
the EU's legal framework in 2007) was to address the field of cross-border
cooperation, with particular emphasis given to the fight against terrorism,
cross-border crime and illegal migration. Morocco and Algeria came under particular
scrutiny - not least because oftheir increasing association with al-Queda
networks.
- The French Presidency recently addressed the council of the European Union
on the issue of Morocco, and made the following statement regarding its intention
to advance its status:
"Taking into account the characteristics of the partner countries, the
French Presidency intends to bring about the completion of the work in progress
to define an advanced status for Morocco as regards the European Union, which
could function as a benchmark for other countries in the region. The objective
of strengthening relations with Israel, which the Presidency will pursue in
keeping with the outcome of the Association Council of 16 June, will have
to take into account developments in the situation in the Middle East with
a view to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."
http://www.ue2008.fr
- David James Smith of The Times alleges that the Portuguese Police
were surprised at the inclusion of Mi5 members at UK Meeting Team - 'Kate
& Gerry: Beyond The Smears'
- It was generally agreed that the McCanns had wasted 'an
astonishing amount of money' raised by public donations by looking for
their missing daughter in Morocco. Barcelona-based agency Metodo 3 invested
huge sums in teams checking out reported sightings of Madeleine in the Rif
mountains of northern Morocco. The McCanns were to waste a further £500,000
of their fund, when Oakland International focused their efforts on smashing
a paedophile ring in Belgium. The Belgian Police said they had no knowledge
of any such network operating in their country.
- Gerry McCann was to meet a broad cross-section of Interior and Justice
Ministers during his 'fact-finding missions' last June and July. So far
his missions have yielded private meetings with Wolfgang Schauble (German
Interior Minister responsible for reviving the Prum Treaty and co-hosting
the 'First Europa Forum on the Rights of the Child' with the EU's
Justice Minister, Franco Frattini), Alberto Gonzales (Minister of Justice
and US Attorney General), the UK's Junior Justice Minister, Baroness Ashton,
Germany's Deputy Justice Minister, Lutz Diwell. In June 2007, during their
visit to Morocco the couple tried to apply pressure on the country's Interior
and Justice Minister, Chakib Benmoussa and other top security officials. At
a time when media interest reached its height in light of the 'Bushra' photo,
Chakib Benmoussa went on record as saying that there was 'no
evidence' that Madeleine was in Morocco. In addition to presiding over
court and criminal issues, the Justice Minister is variously responsible for
Homeland Security and the Prevention of Terrorism. I wonder how much pressure
the McCann Lobby tried to apply on Portuguese Justice Minister, Alberto Costa?
- The issue of 'renewable energies' was one of the first things tabled for
discussion at a meeting to diversigy relations between Portugal and Morocco
as part of the two countries' Memorandum of Understanding. Small wonder to
learn that Alexander Ellis was recently appointed British Ambassador in Portugal
given his previous experience as advisor to President Barroso of the European
Commission on Energy matters. The upshot of sharing statistical data on issues
of security and criminal justice is that it opens the way for greater economic
freedom too.
links:
Context of 'May 16, 2003: Suicide Bombings in Casablanca, Morocco, Kill 45'
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=a051603casablancaattack
Did Islamist Serial Killer Avert British Terror Attack?
http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/004010.html
http://www.lalibre.be/index.php?view=article&art_id=408228
Migration
http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/documentos/293.asp
comments
Author Rob (send 18/09/2008 @ 09:47:21)
Hi BW,
I've just become aquainted with 'Edvige'. In view of your previous excellent
research and insights into databases and a possible link with the McCann narrative
I hoped this latest Orwellian stride might prompt a revisit of this topic.
I think you may well be interested in the latest 3A policy on the mentioning
of The Labour Friends of Israel. It was originally ruled out of bounds because
religion was too contraversial a subject. When this was questioned the admins
and mods retreated for a regroup and made an announcement which I'll dig out
and share.
Author fif (send 18/09/2008 @ 11:17:34)
So here is the 'prepared statement from bjr
"
Quote:
The admin of this site does not see any connection between the 'Friends of
Israel' and the Madeleine case..moreover the admin of this site detects that
attcks/insinuations of the 'Friends of Israel' are often thinly veiled attempts
at Anti Zionism.....the movement that wants to deprive an entire nation of
existence...that to the admin is racism...........and contrary to T&C............(equally
a sustained attack on Pakistan...an Islamic state by constitution..could be
perceived as an attack on Islam-another world religion....equally this attack
will be deemed racist...and contrary to T&C)"
Author fif (send 18/09/2008 @ 11:24:15)
Thanks fif. Pretty much what I expected. Questioning pro-Israeli
policy or its activities on the West Bank has got very little to do with Zionism
(at least from the perspective of those questioning the prudence of UK and
US support and military backing) and it certainly doesn't question the legitimacy
of the Israel State. There's undoubtedly been an anti-Arab slant to the reports
of alleged sightings of Madeleine and I think it's legitimate to present it
within the context of the pro-Israeli press (which the British Red Tops ostensibly
are). Murdoch makes no secret of his pro-Israeli sentiments nor his friendship
with Ariel Sharon and fair play to him. It's about the politics of the press
and asking whether or not an understanding of press politics obliges a better
understanding of these sightings.
Israel has every right to exist. That wasn't being discussed.
The post in question was positioning the Madeleine investigation against the
background of a parallel investigation being carried out by British Intelligence
in Belgium and Morocco (which was planning attacks on Jewish civilian targets
and EU Buildings). The post simply speculated on a possible crossover of interests.
Obviously the 3A's moderator Ratonthebeam (Ms Nyssen) is just flexing her
religious principles in an inappropriate way. She obviously sees it as an
attack on her being Jewish, which is a totally ignorant response as far as
I am concerned.
Where is all that vociferous 'freedom of speech' stuff they were yelling about
when the Daily Mirror forum was pulled?
I think I've hit a nerve somewhat.
The posts are being read by the people who count and that's all that matters.
Whether they appear at 3As is ultimately meaningless.
Had an email from Dr Walt at Harvard about the pro-Israeli lobby in Britain.
Maybe one day we might all be able to enjoy a mature and
open dialogue about it.
Author BW (send 18/09/2008 @ 12:09:14)